Matthew Evans, LA, California, is suing the Company that owns "Match.com", IAC/Interactive Corp. He claims that they have hired girls who set up dates with men, who might otherwise cancel their memberships. This website has about 10-20 million subscribers and about 500 employees. How can even a small fraction be 'hoodwinked' into dating a Match.com employee? The math simply doesn't add up. The Match lawsuit was filed earlier this month in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles by plaintiff Mr.Evans, who contends he went out with a woman he met through the site who turned out to be nothing more than "date bait" working for the company. His lawyer from the firm, Scuzzy, Queeb, Phart and Guzzle, said that this type of corperate activity was a "grossly fraudulent practice".
Which was...almost as gross as some of the "babes" I hooked up with "Match.com". It was my fault to some degree, because my main requirement was "female". My mailbox was filled with pre-op, post-op and assortment of hideous "Carbon based life forms". Yes, I suppose if we threw out the obvious respondents with crippling gender indenty problems, the remaning group's Karyotype would denote the classical "XX" identification(s). However, I wasn't interested in Power Crystals, Vampyre Sex, Taxidermy, Glam rock, Extreme Piercings, Communist Poetry Readings, Pet Lizards, Body length Tatoos, watching old bootlegged VCR tapes of Gallagher, apartments with that wet dog urine smell, talking about (you) finishing film school and botched plastic surgeries. No interest.
No comments:
Post a Comment